Link­ing Boot­strap and Word­Press to get a respon­sive design is the task of bootScore, a WP-theme bring­ing along what the web design­er actu­al­ly does not want to pro­gram her­self. Instead, she can now rely on an MIT-licensed pre­lim­i­nary work host­ed on GitHub. But its ‘stan­dard out­fit’ still must be per­son­al­ized, ‘pimped’ — by the work of a Web Design­er? The theme is adapt­ed — so bootScore — by mod­i­fy­ing its “[…] .scss, .php, and .js files”. So you can pimp your bootScore eas­i­ly. Here are my 13 steps from a pure bootScore to my per­son­al ‘home­page’: […]

Anoth­er ques­tion that I unfor­tu­nate­ly had to answer myself sev­er­al times because I am so for­get­ful: How do I con­nect my Dell lap­top XPS 129240 (WIN11), an Ubun­tu machine (24.04), and my Dell curved mon­i­tor S3423DWC in a way, that I can use both machines with the same key­board and mon­i­tor via the KVM switch inte­grat­ed in the Dell mon­i­tor? […]

Anoth­er ques­tion that I unfor­tu­nate­ly had to answer myself sev­er­al times, because I am so for­get­ful: How can I reli­ably pre­vent my Dell Lap­top with Ubun­tu from going into sus­pend mode when the lid is closed? I need that fea­ture because my devices use the same Dell screen with […]

Anoth­er ques­tion that I unfor­tu­nate­ly had to answer myself sev­er­al times because I am so for­get­ful: How do I quick­ly set up a func­tion­al­ly iden­ti­cal Ubun­tu dupli­cate?¹ In the past, we had to fid­dle around with dpkg --get-selections and dpkg --set-selections. Today, it’s eas­i­er — with apt-clone: […]

As a “pow­er­ful, free Boot­strap starter theme for Word­Press”, bootScore uses the col­or con­cept of Boot­strap by mark­ing up its ele­ments accord­ing­ly. Con­se­quent­ly, each bootScore instance ini­tial­ly starts with the same out­fit. How­ev­er, it also offers tech­niques to mod­i­fy the default design so that a web design­er can define and imple­ment her cus­tomized col­ors in and with bootScore: […]

Dis­play­ing an appro­pri­ate cook­ie dia­log is one thing. Giv­ing it a real mean­ing is anoth­er. Because ask­ing per­mis­sion alone is not enough. We also need to eval­u­ate the respons­es: We must only store those cook­ies on our read­er’s com­put­ers they — or the law — have con­sent­ed to. A JavaScript func­tion that imple­ments this require­ment sets the seman­tics of the cook­ie dia­log. Based on such a func­tion, we use prop­er­ly man­aged cook­ies. […]

With­out per­mis­sion, we may not write cook­ies to the hard disk of our read­er. Because it belongs to her, not to us. By access­ing our site, she has already implic­it­ly giv­en her con­sent to store our tech­ni­cal­ly nec­es­sary cook­ies. Because they are tech­ni­cal­ly nec­es­sary to read our post. But she must explic­it­ly per­mit us to save the oth­er cook­ies on her com­put­er before we are going to do so. More­over, we must have enabled her to query what these cook­ies are for before we offer her to answer our request. That’s the mean­ing if we talk about prop­er­ly used cook­ies. […]

Last time it was­n’t hard any­more: With­in two days my post about my ‘reset’ because of lack­ing an ‘inner link­ing’ and about the ‘right way to be crawled and indexed’ had been processed by Google. Like my revised posts, I had designed it in accor­dance with the rec­om­men­da­tions of YOAST that take into account Google’s ‘unspo­ken’ spec­i­fi­ca­tions — as pro­claimed by YOAST. How­ev­er, by fol­low­ing these rules, I had also giv­en in to the styl­is­tic supe­ri­or­i­ty of Google and YOAST: […]

It’s a while ago, that I wrote about SEO. That should not be a big deal, I thought at that time. In its tem­plates, bootScore thank­ful­ly uses seman­tic HTML tags by default. Thus, it should be suf­fi­cient to sub­mit one’s own sitemap to Google & Co. Enrich­ing the pages them­selves with addi­tion­al key­words should be super­flu­ous. A good pri­ma­ry con­tent would be enough. No need for a sec­ond text behind the actu­al one. That’s the way, I thought. More­over, I saw no rea­son to talk about inter­nal link­ing. Rarely has Google so embar­rass­ing­ly proven me wrong: […]

To speed up deliv­er­abil­i­ty, the devel­op­ers most­ly dis­trib­ute com­pressed JavaScript libraries that do not con­tain any white­spaces, line feeds, and com­ments. They have mini­fied the libs. As a result, they usu­al­ly con­tain only very rudi­men­ta­ry license infor­ma­tion — at least not the license text itself. But all FOSS licens­es require us to ship some com­pli­ance arti­facts with the code — espe­cial­ly the license text. This is the chal­lenge for using JavaScript com­pli­ant­ly — in bootScore and else­where: […]